The contempt case filed by ACS AIGETOA BSNL CO Chapter against Shri A Robert J Ravi (CMD BSNL) and others was heard today before the Hon’ble PCAT. The following remedies have been pleaded before the Bench:

1] Take cognizance of the present Contempt Petition and initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the alleged Contemnors (CMD BSNL and others) under Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, read with Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and the Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, 1992, and issue notice to the alleged Contemnors to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against and punished for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the final order dated 22.04.2026 passed by this Hon’ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 3677/2025;

2] Hold that the continued failure and refusal of the Respondents to implement the final order dated 22.04.2026, coupled with the issuance of the Office/Modification Order dated 05.08.2026, purporting to modify the transfer order dated 02.05.2025, which had already been quashed by this Hon’ble Tribunal, constitutes wilful, deliberate and contumacious disobedience of the final order dated 22.04.2026 and an impermissible attempt to circumvent the binding directions of this Hon’ble Tribunal;

3] Direct the Respondents to forthwith implement, in its true letter and spirit, the final order dated 22.04.2026, including by duly considering and giving effect to the Petitioner’s joining report dated 27.04.2026, permitting the Petitioner to join/resume service in accordance with the said order, and extending to him all consequential service and monetary benefits flowing therefrom, in accordance with law;

4] Impose exemplary costs upon the Respondents/alleged Contemnors for their blatant and deliberate disregard of the binding order of this Hon’ble Tribunal and for attempting to circumvent and defeat the effect of the final order dated 22.04.2026 through the subsequent Office/Modification Order dated 05.08.2026, and pass such further order(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice.

The Bench has issued notice to all the alleged Contemnors. The next date of hearing has been fixed for 16th October 2026.

BMS writes to Hon’ble MoC, Hon’ble MoSC, Secretary Telecom, Chairman PESB, Secretary ACC and Principal Secretary to PM requesting Timely Completion of the Selection Process and Appointment of Regular Chairman & Managing Director (CMD), BSNL as per the Notified Schedule. BMS has made following demands:

1] The recruitment process is not scrapped midway, as unfortunately happened during the PESB selection interviews in 2025

2] The selection process for the post of CMD, BSNL is completed immediately without any further delay.

3] The appointment of the regular CMD is finalized at the earliest so that BSNL receives stable, dedicated and full-time leadership after more than two years of ad hoc arrangements.

4] The ongoing revival initiatives and strategic projects of BSNL continue without any disruption on account of prolonged vacancy in the top leadership.

BMS has reiterated its commitment to ensure that BSNL gets a regular CMD at the earliest so that the prolonged adhocism for this post comes to an end immediately.

Click here for Letter

GS AIGETOA write to Director HR, sought complete financial details of expenditure incurred by the Administration Section, BSNL Corporate Office for the periods 01.03.2022 to 14.07.2024 and 15.07.2024 to 16.09.2026.

Click here for the Letter

The Association has sought details covering vehicles, functions and meetings, food and catering, vendors, bills, sanctions, payments and other related expenditure.

AIGETOA has emphasized that while employees are repeatedly advised to follow austerity measures even for essential operational expenditure, the same principle of financial discipline and austerity must apply equally to the Management. Transparency in administrative expenditure is therefore essential to ensure accountability and responsible utilization of BSNL resources.

The Association has requested the complete details at the earliest and stated if not provided, the matter will be escalated before the appropriate higher authorities.

BSNL Management has initiated disciplinary proceedings against Shri Ravi Shil Verma, Shri Pavan Akhand, Shri Badri Kumar Mehta, Shri Harjinder Singh, Shri Vivek Kumar Singh, Shri Sunil Gautam, Shri Rajeev Meena, Shri Rakesh Meena and Shri Praveen Saini for raising the genuine concerns and grievances of BSNL Executives.

Click here for letter by SR Section

Instead of taking corrective action and resolving the genuine grievances raised by the Association, Management is indulging in coercive practices. If Management thinks that such actions can stop AIGETOA from raising the genuine voice of Executives, let it clearly understand that AIGETOA stands for justice and has a long history of struggles. We will never, ever stop raising the genuine issues of our members.

We have demanded corrective action, due consideration of genuine cases, uniform treatment, time-bound resolution of grievances and strict adherence to the prescribed transfer policy. We have specifically demanded the issuance of cancellation orders in respect of all exempted cases, instead of keeping such cases lingering in an indefinite loop. Today, an employee may be exempted, but tomorrow the same person may again be directed to report or relieved. Therefore, we demanded that clear orders be issued in black and white so that uniform treatment is ensured and ambiguity is eliminated in future.

If Management considers highlighting its wrong decisions and practices to be an offence, we will continue to do so. Nobody can stop us from performing the very work for which the Association has been formed. AIGETOA will continue to raise issues concerning justice, transparency, uniformity and the legitimate interests of BSNL Executives.

It is unfortunate that the CMD BSNL, Director (HR), PGM (Estt.), PGM (Pers./SR), PGM (Admin.) and the concerned HR sections, instead of addressing the genuine grievances raised by the Association, are resorting to measures aimed at intimidating and suppressing AIGETOA, the Association which has consistently stood for justice and the legitimate rights of BSNL Executives.

We consider this action to be a direct outcome of our consistent efforts to raise the voice of Executives and to highlight wrong decisions and practices before the appropriate authorities. Our recent submissions before the Hon’ble Minister, Secretary (T), DoT and other authorities have clearly highlighted serious concerns relating to Customer Onboarding, FTTH, Mobile Services, CDR and IT Billing Systems, BharatNet, Uttarakhand Restructuring Pilot Project and several other issues affecting BSNL and its Executives.

We extend our thanks to Management for showing its real approach to the issues raised by AIGETOA. Isn’t it surprising that the PGM (Admin.), whose relieving has been demanded by the Association, is still not relieved? Isn’t it equally surprising that an Executive attached directly to the CMD’s office is still not relieved? Two Executives were relieved, subsequently reinstated and then again ordered to be relieved, apparently after the Association raised the issue of uniformity and justice.

It is equally concerning that employees with serious personal difficulties, including those who are physically challenged or facing genuine hardships, have been relieved, while persons perceived to be close to Management continue to be retained without any clearly disclosed grounds. Why this selective dispensation? Why is the Association’s demand for uniform treatment considered objectionable?

What is wrong in asking Management to provide a clear and uniform treatment of similarly placed cases? What is wrong in seeking resolution of genuine grievances that have remained pending for months and years? What is wrong in asking Management to fix responsibility and take appropriate action against officers responsible for wrong decisions or lapses?

These are legitimate questions raised by the Association and several of the facts concerning the issues raised by us have themselves been acknowledged in the communication issued by Management.

We also understand this action to be a belated response to the repeated complaints raised by AIGETOA against the functioning of PGM (Admin./Estt.) Shri S P Singh and our demand for his relieving. This so called letter has been issued in response to our latest complaint against PGM (Estb.) to CMD BSNL on 10.09.2026, wherein we raised serious objections regarding the unwarranted interruption by PGM (Estt.) during our meeting with PGM (Pers.).

The Association has already placed its concerns before the competent authorities regarding the manner in which the said incident took place. Instead of examining and addressing the complaint on its merits, Management appears to be protecting the concerned officer while initiating proceedings against the office bearers who raised the issue. This approach is completely unacceptable to AIGETOA and will not deter us from continuing to raise genuine issues.

AIGETOA reiterates that intimidation, disciplinary proceedings or coercive measures cannot silence the voice of the Association. We will continue to raise issues concerning justice, transparency, uniformity and accountability through all legitimate forums available to us.

AIGETOA stands firm. We will continue to speak for the Executives, question wrong practices and demand justice.

As a follow-up to the discussions held with the HR team and Director (HR) on 8th Sept 2026, Team AIGETOA met the PGM (Pers.) today to take up the pending Transfer Retention, Modification and Cancellation cases.

During the meeting, it was informed that the following categories of cases have been agreed for issuance of appropriate orders:

1] PWD cases involving self and caregiver requirements, where the documents are complete in all respects.

2] Medical cases involving self and caregiver requirements, where complete documentation has been submitted.

3] Association immunity cases.

4] Cases involving executives aged 58 years and above.

5] Cases covered/protected by the orders of the Hon’ble Court.

6] Certain modification cases supported by genuine and substantiated grounds.

It was further informed that a formal communication from BSNL Corporate Office regarding ERP relieving will also be issued.

The cases have been compiled and necessary action for issuance of the required orders and reinstatement/restoration of the concerned executives is expected to be completed within the next 2-3 days. Team AIGETOA will continue to follow up closely to ensure that the process is completed expeditiously.

Update on Uttarakhand Pilot Restructuring :

With regard to the Uttarakhand (UKD) Restg. issue, discussions are continuing with both BSNL Management and the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).

Team AIGETOA has placed its detailed submissions before the concerned authorities and has strongly presented the concerns of the affected executives. We are hopeful that the matter will be considered favourably and in the interest of the affected executives and that a suitable resolution will emerge soon.

GS AIGETOA writes to CMD BSNL with strong objection to the unwarranted and provocative intervention of PGM (Establishment), Shri S P Singh, during discussion with PGM (Pers.) on 08.09.2026 and demand for immediate relieving as officer is under transfer and having stay at Delhi since year 2006. Many other senior officers under transfer have been relieved, while PGM (Estt.) has not been relieved defying the principle of uniformity and equal treatment by BSNL Management.

Click here for letter

Association request for personal intervention of CMD BSNL in ensuring the needful action against Shri S P Singh, PGM (Establishment/Admin/Recruitment/Training) and also ensuring the release from the BSNL CO in compliance to the existing transfer orders to Karnataka telecom Circle which has remained unimplemented since August 2024.

We wish to make it clear that our demand is not against any individual personally. Our concern is entirely regarding the manner in which the HR machinery is being operated and the impact of such conduct on employee morale and industrial relations. We strongly believe that no individual officer, irrespective of his position, should be allowed to create an environment of confrontation with employees or their recognized Association.

Subsequent to the discussions held with the Team of Hon’ble Minister of State for Communications (MoSC) last week, Team AIGETOA had a scheduled meeting with Shri K. Balaji, Joint Secretary (Admin), DoT on 8th September 2026.

During the meeting, AIGETOA comprehensively raised several critical issues concerning the interests of BSNL executives, service conditions, HR policies and the long-pending demands of employees. The major issues discussed and the response received from DoT are as follows:

1] Uttarakhand Pilot Restructuring Model

AIGETOA strongly placed its submissions regarding the Uttarakhand Pilot Restructuring Model and explained the serious concerns arising from its implementation in the present form.

The Association requested that the implementation be halted immediately and that BSNL Management be directed to hold a detailed consultation with all stakeholders before proceeding further, so that a model acceptable to all and serving the interests of both BSNL and its employees can be evolved.

JS (Admin) informed that he had gone through the submissions made by AIGETOA and stated that certain directions have already been given to BSNL Management in this regard. He advised the Association to pursue the matter further with BSNL Management.

2] Appointment of Regular CMD, BSNL

Regarding the long-pending appointment of a regular CMD, BSNL, JS (Admin) informed that the Search Committee is undertaking the process and that efforts are being made to complete the process at the earliest.

AIGETOA emphasized the importance of having a regular CMD at the helm of BSNL for providing stable leadership and expediting critical organizational decisions.

3] Long-Pending Issues of Promotion

AIGETOA strongly raised the continuing delay in promotions of eligible executives and apprised JS (Admin) of the difficulties being faced by employees due to the prolonged uncertainty.

It was informed that BSNL has been directed repeatedly to resolve the promotion issues, while BSNL has cited pending court cases as one of the reasons for the delay.

AIGETOA explained that its detailed submissions already contain an alternative mechanism for granting promotions to all eligible candidates, without adversely affecting the pending legal proceedings.

The Association further pointed out that despite directions from the Hon’ble Minister of Communications (MoC) to examine the proposal and submit feedback, BSNL has still not taken any concrete decision.

AIGETOA requested suitable intervention and immediate directions to BSNL to resolve the promotion issue through the proposed alternative mechanism. JS (Admin) noted the request.

4] Status of High-Level HR Committee Recommendations

AIGETOA sought an update on the recommendations of the High-Level HR Committee.

JS (Admin) informed that the matter is under process and that the work is progressing. He further stated that the exercise is expected to be concluded soon.

5] Violations of Transfer Policy and Forced Relieving of Executives

AIGETOA strongly highlighted instances of violations of the prescribed Transfer Policy, particularly the forced relieving of executives who are eligible for immunity under various provisions of the policy.

The Association also brought to the notice of JS (Admin) the impression being created by certain quarters of BSNL Management that such forced relieving is being carried out under the instructions of DoT.

JS (Admin) categorically clarified that DoT’s intervention in BSNL is restricted to larger aspects of policy making and broad administrative matters, while operational and establishment-related decisions fall within the prerogative of the BSNL Board, Management and its administrative setup.

He advised AIGETOA to take up the specific issues with BSNL Management.

AIGETOA shall continue to pursue the matter with BSNL Management to ensure strict adherence to the prescribed Transfer Policy and protection of the legitimate rights of eligible executives.

6] 3rd PRC and Standard Pay Scales

The Association raised the critical issues of implementation of the 3rd Pay Revision/3rd PRC recommendations and restoration of Standard Pay Scales for BSNL executives.

JS (Admin) advised AIGETOA to wait for some more time and informed that he would discuss the status of these issues in the next meeting.

AIGETOA reiterated that these are long-pending and critical issues affecting the career and financial interests of BSNL executives and require an early resolution.

7] Increase in SAB Contribution and Revision of TA/DA

AIGETOA raised the issues concerning enhancement of SAB contribution and revision of TA/DA rates.

It was informed that the matter has finally received the go-ahead for being placed before the BSNL Board and that the proposal is expected to be placed in the next meeting of the BSNL Board.

Team AIGETOA today met PGM (Pers) and strongly conveyed its serious objection to the manner in which yesterday’s relieving has been carried out, despite several discrepancies having already been highlighted in the order issued on 09.05.2026.

Subsequently, PGM (Estt.) also joined the discussion. It was brought to notice that even the ERP struck-off has been carried out selectively and in one particular case, a person has reportedly been reinstated without any approval or direction from the competent authority, solely at the discretion of DGM (Pers-I). It was further pointed out that even PGM (Pers) was not aware of this development.

We categorically clarified that AIGETOA is not opposed to any genuine relaxation or relief in deserving cases. However, extending such relaxation selectively to a few individuals while ignoring other similarly placed candidates is a matter of serious concern and was strongly opposed. We demanded immediate corrective action to ensure that the process is applied uniformly and transparently to all similarly placed candidates.

We also demanded immediate resolution of all pending applications relating to Retention/Cancellation/Modification. AIGETOA strongly objected to the continued delay and daily dilly-dallying by the Pers Section, particularly with regard to the submission and verification of missing documents. It was pointed out that on several occasions, the AIGETOA team had specifically raised cases where applications were being kept pending on the pretext of missing documents. However, only when the matter was taken up and the time for disposal had approached, the concerned officers started pointing out or showing the alleged missing links/documents.

We strongly demanded that responsibility be fixed upon the officers responsible for such negligence and undue delay. Such an approach not only causes avoidable hardship to the affected employees but also raises serious questions regarding the uniformity, transparency and fairness of the process.

It was further highlighted that Retention/Cancellation/Modification cases appear to have been dealt with selectively, while similarly placed candidates, including medical and PwD cases, have allegedly been ignored despite having comparable grounds. AIGETOA strongly objected to such selective treatment and demanded immediate corrective action, uniform application of the rules, and fixation of responsibility for any deliberate or negligent delay or discriminatory handling of cases.

AIGETOA reiterated that any decision concerning relieving, retention, cancellation, modification or ERP status must be taken strictly as per the applicable rules and with due approval of the competent authority, without any selective or discretionary treatment.

After AIGETOA highlighted the points, both PGM (Pers.) and PGM (Estt.) discussed the concerns raised by us pointwise with the Director (HR) and CMD, BSNL.

In conclusion, it was informed that all the issues raised by AIGETOA shall be decided by Monday, 14th September 2026. Accordingly, We will hold next meeting with HR Team on Monday. It was firmly assured that the needful corrective action and consideration of the cases including those eligible for different type of immunity shall be decided by that time.

The Office of the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India, has taken cognizance of the issues raised by the Bharatiya Doorsanchar Manch (BDM) regarding the long-pending HR and service-related issues in BSNL.

Click here for letter

Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi has referred to BDM’s notice dated 25.05.2026 and highlighted key issues including implementation of 3rd PRC, settlement of pending 2nd PRC matters, One Company-One Policy, timely promotions, withdrawal of the SET Recruitment Process, pending HR Committee reports and compassionate appointments.

The Regional Labour Commissioner has asked the concerned authority to take appropriate action and submit a status report/action taken report on the matter.

Further, Upon the follow-up by Team AIGETOA with the Office of Chief Labour Commissioner, it was conveyed that status report and action taken on issues is being called for from BSNL and DOT. Thereafter, If required the joint meeting with the concerned authorities along with BDM may be held.

The Bharatiya Doorsanchar Manch (BDM) writes to Hon’ble Prime Minister of India with detailed representation seeking time-bound implementation of the recommendations of the Committee on Public Undertakings (COPU) concerning BSNL and removal of disparities in service conditions among different categories of employees.

Click here for Letter with Detailed Representation

Click here for Covering Letter

The representation highlights the need for:

• Implementation of 3rd PRC with an appropriate affordability waiver.
• Delinking of pension revision from pay revision for existing executives.
• Implementation of standard E2 and E3 pay scales and resolution of pay losses being faced by different categories of executives.
• Regular and time-bound promotions and a structured career progression framework.
• Succession planning and leadership development to utilise BSNL’s experienced and professionally qualified manpower.
• Improvement in pay, allowances, superannuation benefits and post-retirement welfare under the principle of “One PSU – One Policy.”
• Operational empowerment and faster decision-making at appropriate levels.

BDM has emphasized that BSNL is a strategic national asset and that the Government’s investments in its revival need to be complemented by operational reforms, a motivated workforce and effective HR policies.

BDM has requested the Hon’ble Prime Minister’s kind and personal intervention for expeditious implementation of the COPU recommendations and necessary directions to DoT/BSNL.