The agenda Meeting of AIGETOA with BSNL Management was held on 6th October 2026. The meeting started at 4.15 PM and lasted until 9.30 PM. The entire CHQ team was present, along with the CS/CPs of Delhi and CNTX-N Circles. The submitted agenda was discussed in detail.
A brief of the discussions is given below:
At the outset, PGM (SR) welcomed the participants. He extended his good wishes and expressed hope that the deliberations would be fruitful and productive.
The All-India President, Shri G. Veerabhadra Rao, introduced the participants and expressed displeasure over the current state of affairs in BSNL. He stated that BSNL should function according to established rules and policies, rather than individual thought processes. The AIP also criticized Management’s handling of unions and associations, particularly the way the GS and office-bearers of AIGETOA had been targeted for opposing the wrong decisions and highlighting the process discrepancies.
General Secretary Shri Ravi Shil Verma emphasized that BSNL is a public limited company owned by the Government of India and should function in accordance with established rules and policies. He highlighted that almost all BSNL policies have been rendered ineffective, be it the restructuring policy, transfer policy, long-stay policy, procurement policies, operational policies, or even the REA Rules, 2014.
The GS stated that a government-owned company was being run in a manner that even private limited companies would not follow. He requested Management to ensure that the company functions according to established norms, rather than like a proprietary firm. He also stated that Management should not seek to assert its authority through coercive actions against AIGETOA office-bearers, as its authority as the senior-most management was not in doubt. He said that the relationship should remain one of boss and subordinate, not owner and worker. He categorically stated that, as a Government of India company, BSNL has no individual owner; all are employees, whether at senior, middle, or junior levels. This should not be forgotten by Management or employees. BSNL must therefore function according to rules, policies, and hierarchy, rather than anyone’s individual notions.
After the introductory session, the GS placed the agenda points before Management:
A] Establishment and Pay Related Matters
1] Affordability Waiver for Implementation of 3rd PRC in BSNL:
Association explained the efforts of AIGETOA through which the matter has reached the highest level. Management informed that they have already forwarded the recommendations to DoT and the issue lies within the purview of DoT.
AIGETOA highlighted that, when the BSNL Board last recommended the 3rd PRC, BSNL sent multiple DO letters to DoT emphasizing the need for an affordability waiver. Association further highlighted that AIGETOA along with BDM and BMS has raised the issue of affordability waiver citing the importance of the national telecom carrier and BSNL’s role in fulfillment of national telecom objectives and its support in bridging the digital divide through projects like Bharatnet and 4G saturation etc to the highest offices including the PMO and MoC and the same received positive attention also. The Association asked how many such DO letters or reminders had been sent by the current Management of BSNL to DoT highlighting the need for affordability waiver. AIGETOA stressed the need for another DO letter from CMD BSNL to DoT, highlighting BSNL’s involvement in projects of national importance, including the rollout of Swadeshi 4G so that same can be pursued by AIGETOA, BDM and BMS for resolution.
Management agreed to send a reminder to DoT through a DO letter.
2] Rule 55A implementation:
GS sought the reasons from Management on the sudden modification of Rule 55A. It was informed that the same has done to make Rule 55A more transparent and to align with the Government Rules. GS AIGETOA replied that Rule 55A is still not consistent with GoI Rule 56J for Probity Guidelines and needs modification. While it is clearly visible that punishing points have been adopted but the good points have been left like BSNL rule 55A has set the age criteria as 50 while GoI 56J rules keeps the age limit as 55. Similarly other factors are also there which needs correction. GS further highlighted the toxic/panic situation in field through orders like rule_55A, Uttarakhand Restructuring, 43-page document on employee Roles without any reference to the Resources and Constraints. GS requested for clarity from Management on the intent of the order, so that the matter can be communicated to the employees.
Management assured AIGETOA that there was no intention to use force or coercion and, therefore, there was no need for panic. Management further stated that AIGETOA’s concerns had been noted and would be examined in consultation with higher management. If considered appropriate, the order would be reviewed. Management sought written inputs from AIGETOA, which have subsequently been prepared and submitted.
3] Uttarakhand Pilot Restructuring and Implementation of Restructuring in other circles:
AIGETOA categorically highlighted that the orders issued in Uttarakhand Circle must be kept on hold and an objective examination of the decision must be held. Team AIGETOA further told that all circles restructuring must be kept on hold till the objective analysis of the Uttarakhand Model is done.
Management agreed to the view of AIGETOA and stated that Restructuring in other circles will be kept on hold. We also highlighted that few Circles like Maharashtra have unilaterally implemented their own restructuring and categorically demanded for instructions to circle for revoking the same. Management agreed for the same and told that they will ensure that such instructions are revoked without any delay.
Management also assured AIGETOA that matters relating to relieving and posting in Uttarakhand would be addressed through direct communication from the Corporate Office to CGMT, Uttarakhand.
4] CDR AMC issues, field situation of issues on infrastructure like battery, Power Plant, DGs:
GS AIGETOA expressed strong apprehension, if the decisions of Management have been taken keeping the long-term interest of BSNL in mind. He highlighted the concerns and shared the written inputs.
Management assured to address the concerns raised by AIGETOA.
5] Implementation of E2/E3 for JTO/JAO and SDE/AO:
AIGETOA demanded for resolution of this residual issue of 2nd PRC. Management again read the very same letter of 2022 issued to SNEA during CLC negotiations and cited the issue has attained finality. AIGETOA also objected on the wrong notion given by BSNL that decision to give E1 had the concurrence of DPE and produced Papers which clearly stated that DPE has only directed to choose the standard scale and no intermediary scales.
The same was vehemently objected by AIGETOA and it was told that when DoT is examining the matter and even BSNL has submitted an affidavit in the court case by AIGETOA that BSNL Board has recommended E2 for JTO/JAO/Equivalent and E3 for SDE/AO/Equivalent, how BSNL can state this on record that the issue has attained finality. AIGETOA requested for another reminder to DoT and taking up the matter immediately with DoT instead of towing the lines given by Establishment cell of BSNL CO. Management agreed to take up the matter with DoT through a written communication.
Management also agreed to examine the contentions stated by AIGETOA with respect to the DPE Concurrence.
6] Report of 22820 Pay Loss Committee:
AIGETOA informed that a committee for extending 22820 as initial basic was constituted during MA period of AIGETOA in 2021 and the committee met 2-3 times thereafter. AIGETOA said that during last three years, there was no progress at all and the issue still remains pending to be recommended and in fact all members of the committee have changed now. It was agreed to reconstitute the committee by inducting new members and expedite the report.
7] E1+5 increments to all JTOs/JAOs recruited/promoted after 01.01.2007:
AIGETOA highlighted that this issue has remained pending despite matter reaching to BSNL Board for other batches at that time. The same needs to be finalized and extended to all the remaining batches recruited/promoted after 01.01.2007.
The matter was agreed to re-examine once again in reference to the previous proposal pending before BSNL Board.
8] JE period Pay Loss Matter:
AIGETOA highlighted the issue and stated that the pay-fixation on promotion has been wrongly done. We pressed the matter for resolution.
Initially Management Refused but after strong presentation of facts and documents by Team AIGETOA, finally they agreed to constitute a committee.
9] Increase of SAB quantum and Transport Allowance:
Association highlighted that due to strong efforts of AIGETOA and BDM and the subsequent intervention from Hon’ble MoSC, the issue of increase in SAB contribution got renewed attention. It was sad that management instead of justifying the increase, tried all efforts to negate the issue. However, after continuous persuasion by AIGETOA and continuous follow up by Hon’ble MoSC himself, finally Management Committee of BSNL recommended a meagre 0.5% increase in SAB. It was sad to note that even this meagre 0.5% increase in SAB approved by Management Committee of the Board could not see the light of the day. We highlighted that while orders on TA/DA revision has been issued, the other proposal of SAB increase of 0.5% has not been issued.
Management informed that few queries were raised with regard to proposal which are being addressed. Management assured to process the case expeditiously and ensure the orders at the earliest. AIGETOA will take all efforts to get the increase notified at the earliest and will continue its efforts to increase the quantum further.
10] Transport Allowance:
AIGETOA raised its strong objection on dropping the Transport Allowance increase proposal and requested to reinitiate it. Management agreed to take up the issue once again.
AIGETOA also requested an increase in Children’s Education Allowance and restoration of LTC.
Management expressed its inability to consider all the demands at the same time and asked us to wait for some more time.
11] Increase in Gratuity Amount for BSNL recruits as 25 Lacs:
AIGETOA pointed the disparity of Gratuity amount of 25 lakhs Vs 20 Lakhs between DoT-absorbed employees and BSNL-recruited employees. It was informed that matter lies in the purview of DPE.
AIGETOA requested BSNL to formally bring this disparity to DPE’s notice so that DPE could take cognizance and issue the necessary directions. An official communication from BSNL to DPE highlighting the disparity was requested to enable AIGETOA to pursue the matter further.
Management agreed to explore the same.
12] Disparity in Earned Leave Encashment for BSNL-Recruited Employees on VR/Resignation Before the Age of 55 Years
AIGETOA demanded the removal of the disparity in EL encashment, whereby BSNL-recruited employees are eligible for only 150 days of EL encashment on VR/resignation before the age of 55 and stated that it is necessary to bring their eligibility at par with 300 days of EL encashment available to other employees by making the necessary amendments to the provisions governing voluntary retirement, consistent with those of the central Government. GS shared the Documents and stated that while Central Government and other PSUs have addressed this disparity, BSNL is yet to do the needful. AIGETOA highlighted the need for amendment in CDA Rules accordingly.
Management agreed to review the provision and the changes required in the CDA Rules. They informed that a committee would be constituted to submit recommendations within a time-bound period.
13] Extension of NPS option to BSNL-recruited employees:
AIGETOA once again requested for extending the option to BSNL-recruited employees for Conversion of Superannuation Fund to NPS. Management explained the non-uniformity in communication by other stake holders.
AIGETOA suggested to keep both the scheme open and the decision can be taken by concerned employee. GS AIGETOA produced the documents from other PSUs where both the options are working. We highlighted that forfeiture of SAB amount on resignation also needs to be addressed.
Management agreed to place the matter before the Management Committee again and to examine to remove the SAB Forfeiture clause in line with the prevailing DPE guidelines.
14] Creation of PRMB trust to BSNL-recruited employees:
AIGETOA demanded the creation of PRMB trust citing the rules and BSNL recruited employee hardship on retirement.
Management agreed to get the comments from establishment and finance comments on the matter and will review the matter.
15] CCS Pension of TTAs recruitment initiated in DoT period:
The CCS pension matter of TTAs whose recruitment initiated in DoT period was discussed. It was informed that matter is subjudice and they will take comments from legal section on the matter and accordingly the matter will be discussed with AIGETOA.
16] Rule 8 & Rule 9 cases:
Rule 8/ Rule 9 cases issues were explained in detail by association. AIGETOA stressed upon the need for reviewing the surplus/deficit criteria as even the medical/spouse cases are getting stopped. AIGETOA requested for immediate review and incorporation of Suitable Provisions. Management agreed to get the matter examined and reviewed expeditiously.
GS AIGETOA also highlighted the restrictive and discriminatory five-year eligibility clause applicable to Special LICE JTOs. He pointed out that, in similar circumstances, AIGETOA’s request to remove the five-year restriction had been accepted for directly recruited JTOs and argued that the same relief should be extended to Special LICE JTOs.
Management agreed to review the matter despite negative comments from Estt Cell.
17] Provision of second Saturday leave uniformly for Employees:
The AIGETOA raised this issue as discriminatory, considering the number of working hours relative to remuneration, as some executives work longer hours for the same remuneration.
Management expressed difficulty in granting leave on the second Saturday uniformly to all field employees. However, it agreed to explore the possibility of granting compensatory leave in lieu of work performed on the second Saturday. AIGETOA to give a fresh representation to Establishment Cell on the matter.
B] Promotion and Recruitment Related Matters
1] Issuance of SDE to AGM promotions:
We requested for consideration of the proposal submitted by AIGETOA which will benefit all cadres from JTO to DGM.
Management expressed the non-availability of vacancies and cited the non-availability of manpower in the feeder cadre of executives, if proposal of AIGETOA is considered. GS AIGETOA explained that the issue of Feeder Cadre is covered in AIGETOA Proposal. PGM (Pers) Suggested for a separate meeting on the same and requested AIGETOA to give the inputs with respect to feeder cadre and vacancies treatment especially how the same will be handled in DGM and JTO Cadre. With detailed inputs from AIGETOA, further process can be decided.
AIGETOA also requested promotion of the next group of LICE JTOs to the SDE cadre, covering the entire 2012 LICE batch as sufficient vacancies can be made available.
Management stated that it would obtain vacancy details and process the matter after legal vetting.
2] AGM to DGM Promotions:
Management informed that they are proactively following the Court Proceedings to get the stay vacated. As soon as the stay is vacated, orders can be issued.
AIGETOA suggested all such matter can get resolved once the proposal from AIGETOA gets a consideration. Management assured to discuss in the meeting to be scheduled on the AIGETOA proposal for promotions.
3] AO to CAO promotions:
AIGETOA demanded for immediate issuance of promotions as all the legal hurdles are over and sufficient vacancies availability.
Management agreed to issue the promotion orders, likely within 15 days, as a few formalities were being completed. Management assured the AIGETOA that no obstacles remained now. Inputs from the SEA Section had reached the Personnel Section, and only procedural formalities remained. AIGETOA requested that the process be expedited further.
4] JAO to AO promotions:
AIGETOA demanded subsequent promotions from JAO to AO cadre immediately after the issuance of CAO promotions by filling up all the consequential vacancies. The same was agreed by management after getting clearance from concerned section.
5] JE to JTO LICE promotions:
AIGETOA highlighted the inordinate delay and requested for publishing of LICE held during May 26 and for early posting orders.
Management informed AIGETOA that it would try to issue the orders within one week.
6] Processing of PwD quota DPCs:
The same shall be done as per vacancy availability in PwD Quota. The Pending Process shall be expedited.
7] Lateral Entry Recruitment, SET Notification, Recruitment of GMs on Contract, Serious apprehensions on the mannerism of the external recruitment and Utilization of Internal Talent:
a. SET and Lateral Entry above JTO/JAO Level:
AIGETOA strongly opposed lateral-entry recruitment at levels above JTO/JAO and demanded the scrapping of the SET notification and complete process. It also expressed serious concern that internal talent pool was not being considered for higher managerial positions, stating that this was unfair to existing employees and undermined their career progression.
It was also stated that despite the matter being subjudice and stay on appointments, management moved further with the process. In the event court scraps the recruitment, the expense made on the recruitment shall be recovered from whose Salary – The one who initiated or the one who approved.
The Management did not give any specific assurance or commitment on the issues raised.
AIGETOA side stated that they will go to any extent to stop this recruitment and enforce the recovery of this expenditure from the authority which gave the go-ahead.
b. Recruitment of GMs on Contract:
AIGETOA raised serious objection on the recruitment of GMs on contract and stated that it is bound to create severe procedural discrepancies in the organizational hierarchy. Management Replied that it was done under instructions from DoT as they want internal candidates to lead. AIGETOA said that DoT wanted internal candidate to lead as a permanent measure and not as a stop gap arrangement. We said government itself scrapped the recruitment on contract at JS level, how they will insist any PSU for that.
DoTs focus on creation of internal hierarchy could have been easily done by empaneling the internal candidates with similar qualification and experience instead of searching from outside. This would have saved BSNL money also.
It was informed that in Finance, no suitable candidate was found and they are revisiting the criteria once again. In the Telecom Stream, around 175 applications have been received and they are being scrutinized.
AIGETOA suggested for creation of Panel from the Internal executives and scrap the process of external recruitment. Management agreed to place the suggestions of AIGETOA before the HR committee of DoT for further discussion and consideration (If agreed).
c. Serious Flaws observed on the JTO External Recruitment:
AIGETOA expressed surprise over the communication to the candidates from a Private Domain rather than BSNL Domain. AIGETOA further stated that even the WhatsApp Communication is going from the numbers from private operators belonging to private entities. This raises a serious question mark on the sanctity of the whole process and can lead to involvement of vested interests in the Recruitment. It was emphasized that foul play cannot be ruled out with everything being left on private agencies. We said every organization hires external agencies but communication is made through official channels only.
AIGETOA demanded immediate corrective measure, enquiry and fixing up the responsibility for adopting such process. Management side stated that they will seek comments from recruitment cell on the matter and will revert back.
C] Update on Discussions on Transfer Policy:
1] Implementation of Transfer Policy and Consideration of Pending Transfer Requests:
The AIGETOA strongly emphasized the need for strict adherence to the existing Transfer Policy and sought an update on the proposed new Transfer Policy, on which inputs had been invited in March of the previous year.
Management agreed to hold another meeting with unions, associations, and the committee to finalize the policy. The meeting would be held in due course.
AIGETOA further elaborated on concerns relating to transfers, particularly long-stay cases, immunity, medical grounds, persons with disabilities (PwD), and hard-tenure matters, citing relevant examples. It highlighted instances of extreme hardship and harassment caused by transfers made without due consideration of serious medical conditions and other genuine hardships. It demanded that transfers be affected strictly on a need basis, taking applicable policy provisions and individual circumstances into account.
AIGETOA further stressed the need for transparency in processing One-Time Password (OTP)-based transfer requests and for the timely dissemination of accurate information to employees.
Following the recent demise of an SDE from Uttar Pradesh, GS AIGETOA expressed serious concern and requested Management to fix responsibility and take appropriate action against the officials at BSNL Corporate Office and UP (East) who were involved in the employee’s relieving and the delay in cancellation of the transfer. Management assured the AIGETOA that the matter would be examined in detail and responsibility fixed.
Management acknowledged the concerns raised by the AIGETOA on Transfer issues. Director (HR) assured that pending cases involving medical grounds, PwD, modification of transfer orders, and immunity would be considered. Association immunity cases shall also be processed immediately. It was further decided to hold a separate meeting on 7th October 2026 to examine and resolve pending cases expeditiously, on a case-by-case basis. The meeting was subsequently held and management side assured to issue the orders in around 10 days’ time.
2] Timely Posting of Hard-Tenure Substitutes and Consideration of OTP Cases
The AIGETOA requested timely posting of substitutes for executives completing their hard tenure, following the practice adopted two years earlier. It also requested consideration of OTP requests from executives who had completed two years of service in other circles.
The AIGETOA requested that transfer and posting orders for executives who had completed their hard tenure be issued by 31 October, without further delay.
The Management agreed to consider the suggestions after further discussions.
3] Shifting of the OTP Window from January to October
AIGETOA suggested restoring two OTP windows in a year. Alternatively, it requested that the OTP window be shifted from January to October, after completion of the January 2027 window, to provide employees with sufficient time to plan and exercise their transfer options.
The Management took note of the suggestion and assured the AIGETOA that the feasibility of the proposal would be explored.
4] Publishing of long-stay List:
It was informed that necessary modifications are being incorporated in ESS module so that Employee will be able to see his status in the circle. AIGETOA requested for publication of long-stay and surplus/deficit circle List which was agreed upon by the Management from the next OTP window.
5] Implementation of Sensitive Post Rotation
AIGETOA demanded proper and uniform implementation of the policy governing the rotation of executives from sensitive posts, in accordance with applicable guidelines.
The PGM (Pers.) informed that the Vigilance Section was monitoring sensitive-post rotation and that necessary action would be taken in accordance with its directions from time to time. AIGETOA to Submit a fresh representation to CVO in this regard.
6] Retention of Quarters in Cases of Normal Transfers
The AIGETOA suggested allowing executives to retain their allotted quarters in cases of transfer, create rules and conditions in this regard, to reduce relocation-related hardship.
Management agreed to explore the feasibility of the proposal.
7] Transfer Back of Lady Executives and 58+ age executives Transferred to Other Circles under Earlier Long-Stay Orders
AIGETOA requested that women executives and executives aged 58 or above who had joined other circles in compliance with earlier long-stay transfer orders be considered for transfer back immediately at their choice stations, in the interest of fairness to those who had complied with the earlier orders.
Management agreed to consider the request.
8] Intra-Circle Transfers in Non-Territorial Circles
AIGETOA highlighted issues arising from intra-circle transfers in non-territorial circles, particularly when territorial circles change. It requested that CGMTs of non-territorial circles be given the necessary permissions to address such cases appropriately.
The Management assured the AIGETOA that the concerns raised would be addressed.
9] Publication of Excess/Deficit Position and Stay Lists Before OTP Windows
AIGETOA emphasized the need for greater transparency in the transfer process and requested the following:
a] Publication of the excess/deficit position of circles.
b] Transparent publication of employee stay lists before the opening of OTP windows.
c] Clear communication of the available circle options for exercising OTP requests.
d] Maintenance of OTP waiting list.
Consideration of three choices for Request as well as the Long Stay Transfers.
The Management agreed that the above information would be published to facilitate transparency and enable employees to make informed choices.
10] Cooling-Off Period between Two Transfers: Intra-Circle and Inter-Circle
The AIGETOA raised the need to prescribe a reasonable cooling-off period between transfers, covering both intra-circle and inter-circle transfers, to ensure consistency and prevent frequent transfers from causing avoidable hardship to executives.
The Management agreed to consider the matter.
D] Administrative Matters:
1] Restoration of OD Medical Reimbursement and IDA
AIGETOA requested the following measures:
a] Restoration of OD medical reimbursement to 25 days, as applicable earlier.
b] Unfreezing of IDA from the April 2020 level, to address the concerns of employees arising from the continued freezing of IDA.
The above demands were placed before Management for consideration. Management made no commitment regarding restoration to 25 days but agreed once again to explore the prospects of unfreezing of IDA and its revision to the current level.
2] Group Health Insurance (GHI) to BSNL Employees
AIGETOA demanded group health insurance (GHI) for BSNL employees through payment of a premium by BSNL or the implementation of cashless treatment at empaneled hospitals.
Management acknowledged the concern and suggested exploring the implementation of GHI after a detailed analysis and discussion with PGM (Admin), who was not present at the meeting.
E] Building and Land Management
1] Proper Maintenance of IQs/Staff Quarters:
Proper maintenance of IQ, Staff Quarters and Explore the possibility of running the inspection quarters by recognized associations:
Management assured AIGETOA that proper upkeep and maintenance would be ensured and sufficient funds are being released for maintenance of IQs.
AIGETOA suggested that associations be allowed to maintain inspection quarters (IQs) on a cooperative basis to ensure proper upkeep and transparency in allotment.
To explore the possibility of associations operating the IQs, Management requested a detailed proposal and suggested discussing the matter with CGM (BW). AIGETOA to submit the same.
On staff quarters and office building maintenance, Management assured to direct BW section to issue necessary advisory and stated that sufficient funds are being allocated.
F] SR/Training/Other Related Issues
1] Holding of regular agenda meetings as per REA.
Agreed by management.
2] One PSU One Association:
Management agreed to explore the concept again and asked the GS AIGETOA and the team to meet on 7th October 2026 with the earlier inputs. (The meeting was subsequently held and the inputs were submitted. Management assured AIGETOA that it would respond within 15 days.)
3] Hired vehicles policy review:
Management agreed to review.
4] EPF higher Pension issue:
GS AIGETOA highlighted the circles where the issue is still pending to be addressed. Management assured to direct the circles once again to take up the matter once again with EPF authorities.
5] Restoration of training-center allowance:
Not Agreed by management as of now and told to wait for some time for reconsideration.
6] Kashmir Valley Allowance:
GS presented the necessary documents and stated that the PSUs and Banks are also giving the same. GS AIGETOA expressed surprise over Establishment cell action to endorse the same only for government employees on deputation while the issue actually arose from the demand for BSNL.
Management assured the Association that the issue would be re-examined in light of AIGETOA’s submissions.
7] Co-existence of ALTTC and NCA at NCA Campus:
GS AIGETOA desired the status of the Progress as the matter was discussed by AIGETOA Team with JS (Admin) wherein it was assured that issue shall be given holistic consideration.
Management informed the AIGETOA that discussions were progressing well and might conclude positively.
8] Posting of executives to training centers in transparent manner and filling up of vacancies:
Management stated that the prescribed process was being followed and requested AIGETOA to highlight any deviations. It assured the AIGETOA that such cases would be addressed.
9] Zonal center trainings for account officers, flexibility to employees for selection of training centers based on the availability of courses, Training of E5-E6 financial upgradation at any of the south circles:
Management agreed to examine the feasibility and do the needful.
10] Hostel / Infra facilities and other needful arrangements at training centers:
AIGETOA highlighted the poor condition of Infra facilities at training centers and non-availability of hostels at few training centers. It was assured that necessary action shall be taken.
11] Proceedings on the complaints submitted by AIGETOA association against PGM (Estt/Admin) and other officers in Pers Section:
It was informed that action on the complaint has been initiated.
12] Dropping of Charges imposed on the Office Bearers of AIGETOA and SNEA at Chennai Telecom Circle:
AIGETOA Reminded Management of the fact that the Charges imposed on the office bearers of Associations for raising the genuine issues at Chennai be dropped as per the assurance given by Management on Several occasions.
Management agreed to expedite on the appeals and do the needful in a timebound manner. They assured that the charges shall be dropped.
The Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the chair and participants.
